| Image | Voter | Winner | Loser | Reason |
|---|
 | Linus Torvalds | William IV | Philip V | I'm all about making things work smoothly and efficiently, and William IV's reign is known for significant political reforms that streamlined the British monarchy, which is kind of like optimizing code. |
 | Andy Weir | Queen Matilda | Philip V | Queen Matilda was a badass who fought for her right to the throne, showing grit and determination that makes her the cool pick here. |
 | Richard P Feynman | Philip V | John Balliol | Well, you see, Philip V of France was more influential in shaping European politics, whereas John Balliol's reign as King of Scotland was marred by political instability and his relative lack of power. |
 | Copernicus | Henry IV | Philip V | Henry IV's life was packed with more drama and action than a summer blockbuster, and his whole 'king by force' story is just way cooler. |
 | Professor Frink | Queen Matilda | Philip V | Oh, glavin! Queen Matilda was a trailblazing powerhouse in a man's world, proving her mettle in a tumultuous era! |
 | Greg Brockman | Henry IV | Philip V | Henry IV was a powerhouse who laid the groundwork for modern France, while Philip V couldn't match that level of impact. |
| Professor Frink | Philip V | John Balliol | Well, glayvin, Philip V had more political savvy and impact on the historical stage, oh my, making him the better choice if we’re talking influence and legacy, ya know! |
 | Albert Einstein | Philip V | Louis II | Philip V's strategic prowess and ability to expand his realm were just a notch above Louis II's accomplishments, as I'd say in a flash of genius. |
 | The Brain | Philip V | James II | Philip V managed to hold onto his throne through war and reforms, while James II just couldn't keep a grip on England before getting booted out. |
 | George Washington Carver | Philip V | Ethelred the Unready | Philip V was a more effective ruler who expanded his kingdom, while Ethelred the Unready struggled with invasions and internal discord. |
 | Belle | Philip V | James II | Philip V of Spain had a more stable reign and left a significant legacy, including the establishment of the Bourbon dynasty, while James II of England was booted out due to his unpopular policies and religious tensions. |
 | George Orwell | Philip V | William IV | Philip V of Macedon brought the fight to the Romans, and that's a pretty bold move in my book. |
| Professor Frink | Philip V | Louis II | Well, Philip V was more of a powerhouse in terms of political influence and left a greater legacy, oh yes indeed. |
 | Louis Pasteur | Henry IV | Philip V | Henry IV, the first king of France from the House of Bourbon, was known for his efforts to bring peace and stability to France after the Wars of Religion, whereas Philip V's reign was less impactful in shaping European history. |
 | Klaus Teuber | Anne of Bohemia | Philip V | Anne of Bohemia's marriage to Richard II helped strengthen diplomatic relations, whereas Philip V's reign, though notable, didn't have the same lasting impact on Europe. |
| Copernicus | Philip V | Ethelred the Unready | Philip V at least kept his throne without the chaos Ethelred faced with those Vikings, making him the more stable ruler. |
 | Guglielmo Marconi | Philip V | William IV | Philip V, the first Bourbon king of Spain, crafted a legacy of reform and cultural influence, setting the stage for a new era, while William IV's reign was more a bridge between the old and the modern without as much lasting impact. |
 | Cicero | Philip V | Anne of Bohemia | Philip V gets the edge for being a king who expanded his realm and power, while Anne of Bohemia was mostly known for her marriage alliance without much political influence. |