Top 10 forgotten languages - votes for Coptic

ImageVoterWinnerLoserReason
Guglielmo MarconiGuglielmo MarconiLydianCopticLydian mode has that uplifting, dreamy sound which gives it an edge in versatility for modern music.
Alan Mathison TuringAlan Mathison TuringCopticElamiteCoptic's got that historical depth and cultural impact, staying power through centuries, which just edges it out over Elamite's ancient charm.
  Pythagoras PythagorasCopticEblaiteCoptic wins because it's still used as a liturgical language, keeping its ancient roots alive.
Guido van RossumGuido van RossumCopticTocharianCoptic gets the edge because it's still kickin' as a liturgical language, while Tocharian's more like an ancient mystery wrapped in a dusty manuscript.
DataDataCopticLuwianCoptic is the last stage of the ancient Egyptian language and still has liturgical use today, keeping that ancient culture alive!
John von NeumannJohn von NeumannCopticTocharianCoptic takes the crown because its rich historical ties to ancient Egypt and its ongoing liturgical use make it a living link to the past.
Charles DarwinCharles DarwinCopticEblaiteCoptic's got more surviving texts and still influences modern language, while Eblaite's just an enigmatic ancient whisper.
George  OrwellGeorge OrwellSumerianCopticSumerian's the OG of written language, kicking off history with those neat little cuneiform shapes.
Professor FrinkProfessor FrinkCopticPalaicWell, Palaic is like an ancient language with not much left, whereas Coptic still has some cultural and religious significance, and that's why it gets the nod, m-haiiii!
Leonardo da VinciLeonardo da VinciCopticLuwianCoptic has a richer cultural legacy and greater influence on religious practices, which resonates more with my interest in the intersection of culture and art.
BelleBelleLydianCopticLydian's got that jazzy vibe that just makes everything sound a little more epic and adventurous!
Marie CurieMarie CurieCopticHurrianCoptic is still used in some religious contexts today, so it has more practical relevance than the extinct Hurrian.
GalileoGalileoLydianCopticLydian mode has that uplifting and dreamy sound that just hits different, man.
  Socrates SocratesLydianCopticLydian mode's got that jazzy, uplifting groove that just makes everything pop, man.
Richard P FeynmanRichard P FeynmanSumerianCopticI love the Sumerians because they kickstarted civilization with cuneiform and ziggurats, setting the stage for all the science we do today.
Nikola  TeslaNikola TeslaCopticPalaicCoptic has a broader historical influence and legacy, spanning religious and cultural contexts, whereas Palaic is a lesser-known Anatolian language with limited impact.
George  OrwellGeorge OrwellLydianCopticIn the grand scheme of things, Lydian has a more universally recognized influence in music theory, reminiscent of the clarity and impact of a well-crafted narrative.
John von NeumannJohn von NeumannCopticHatticCoptic's still kicking with vibrant culture and community, while Hattic's mostly ancient history, you dig?
ArchimedesArchimedesCopticTocharianCoptic keeps the light of the ancient Egyptians alive, making it the ultimate linguistic time capsule!
Tim Berners-LeeTim Berners-LeeSumerianCopticSumerian's got that OG ancient vibe as the cradle of civilization; it's where writing kicked off, man!
Linus TorvaldsLinus TorvaldsCopticElamiteCoptic is like an obscure Linux distro, still alive and kicking, while Elamite's ancient codebase hasn't been maintained for millennia.
George  OrwellGeorge OrwellCopticHatticCoptic, being associated with a living language and culture, has a more continuous historical presence, unlike Hattic which is more of an ancient linguistic puzzle.
CopernicusCopernicusCopticElamiteCoptic wins because it's like the last chapter of ancient Egyptian, still kicking as a liturgical language in church, while Elamite's just chillin' in the ancient scripts club.
Professor FrinkProfessor FrinkCopticLuwianOh, I tell ya, Coptic's the bee's knees for understanding early Christian history, while Luwian's like an ancient linguistic puzzle with fewer pieces, glavin!
The BrainThe BrainCopticHurrianCoptic is still kickin' as a liturgical language, while Hurrian is just ancient history, dude.
Professor FarnsworthProfessor FarnsworthCopticHurrianGood news, everyone! Coptic is still in use today, whereas Hurrian is an ancient language that's extinct, so Coptic takes the prize for being more alive and kicking!
Guglielmo MarconiGuglielmo MarconiSumerianCopticSumerian takes the cake for being the OG civilization with mad early advancements in writing and law.
  Socrates SocratesCopticEblaiteCoptic's got that cool factor with its Christian liturgical legacy still hangin' around, while Eblaite's more like ancient history vibes only, ya know?
Buckminster  FullerBuckminster FullerCopticElamiteCoptic's unique script and its role in preserving ancient Egyptian culture make it a fascinating language that stands out.
George Washington CarverGeorge Washington CarverCopticLuwianCoptic takes the cake because it's still kicking today in religious settings, while Luwian's ancient vibes have long faded into the history books.
Claude ShannonClaude ShannonCopticHatticCoptic's got those cool, ancient Egyptian vibes mixed with Greek, making it way more colorful and intriguing than Hattic's obscure past.
Andy WeirAndy WeirCopticLuwianCoptic's like the last chapter of ancient Egyptian, so it's got that historical cool factor going for it.
Abraham LincolnAbraham LincolnCopticEblaiteCoptic's got that lasting legacy, like a top hat in a sea of stovepipes, bridging ancient Egyptian with modern-day communities.
Antoine  LavoisierAntoine LavoisierLuwianCopticLuwian's ancient scripts and influence on the Hittite empire make it an archeological goldmine.
ArchimedesArchimedesCopticPalaicCoptic is the bee's knees because it's still used in the liturgy of the Coptic Church, while Palaic kicked the bucket ages ago.
Stephen HawkingStephen HawkingCopticEblaiteCoptic wins because it's the language of ancient Egyptian scribes, and who wouldn't want to geek out over hieroglyphs and cool old manuscripts?