| Image | Voter | Winner | Loser | Reason |
|---|
 | Alex Trebek | TRAPPIST-1e | Tau Ceti e | TRAPPIST-1e gets the win because it's part of a cool, tightly-packed system with several Earth-like planets that might be a goldmine for studying habitability. |
 | Data | LHS 1140 b | Tau Ceti e | LHS 1140 b's got that thick atmosphere which might be great for holding onto liquid water, making it a cooler hangout spot for life. |
 | David Macaulay | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-22b | Tau Ceti e is closer to Earth, giving us a better chance to check it out up close, which is super exciting for science! |
 | The Brain | Kepler-186f | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-186f is more similar to Earth in terms of size and is located within the habitable zone, making it a cooler candidate for potential habitability. |
 | Guido van Rossum | Gliese 667 Cc | Tau Ceti e | Gliese 667 Cc is like the cool spot in the Goldilocks zone with three suns, which sounds pretty awesome if you're into sci-fi vibes. |
 | Claude Shannon | TRAPPIST-1e | Tau Ceti e | TRAPPIST-1e is the cosmic VIP because it's part of a super cool system with seven rocky planets, three in the habitable zone, making it an awesome candidate for studying potential extraterrestrial life. |
 | Charles Darwin | Kepler-186f | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-186f is more like the Earth, orbiting in its star's habitable zone, even if it's a bit far away, it's our best bet for finding a similar home. |
| Charles Darwin | Tau Ceti e | K2-18b | Tau Ceti e might be closer to Earth-size and in the habitable zone, so it's got better chances for life as we know it. |
| Charles Darwin | Gliese 667 Cc | Tau Ceti e | Gliese 667 Cc is a better candidate for habitability due to its location within the habitable zone of its star, which increases the chances for liquid water—an essential ingredient for life as we know it. |
 | Lonnie Johnson | Gliese 667 Cc | Tau Ceti e | Gliese 667 Cc takes the cake because it's in a triple star system, making the skies potentially spectacular and unique for any interstellar traveler. |
| Guido van Rossum | Gliese 667 Cc | Tau Ceti e | Gliese 667 Cc seems like a cooler choice because it's in a star system with three suns, which is just mind-blowingly awesome for anyone into astronomy. |
 | Tim Berners-Lee | Kepler-22b | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-22b gets the edge because it sits in the habitable zone of a Sun-like star, giving it a better shot at having Earth-like conditions. |
 | Charles Babbage | TRAPPIST-1e | Tau Ceti e | TRAPPIST-1e is like the cool, habitable exoplanet next door with its Earth-like vibes and stellar neighborhood, while Tau Ceti e is still figuring out its own habitability game. |
 | Copernicus | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-22b | Tau Ceti e might be more interesting 'cause it's in a closer star system and has a better chance of being rocky and Earth-like, at least in theory. |
 | Doc Brown | Proxima Centauri b | Tau Ceti e | Proxima Centauri b is closer to Earth, located just over 4 light years away, making it more feasible for future exploration with our current technology. |
 | Albert Einstein | Kepler-186f | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-186f is more Earth-like in terms of size and location in the habitable zone, making it a cooler candidate for potential life, dude! |
 | David Foster Wallace | Kepler-452b | Tau Ceti e | Kepler-452b wins because it's like Earth's older cousin, offering a familiar vibe that feels just a bit more promising for a hypothetical vacation spot. |
| Guido van Rossum | Gliese 667 Cc | Tau Ceti e | Gliese 667 Cc looks like a cooler spot with its potential for liquid water, while Tau Ceti e is just a bit too iffy for comfort right now. |
 | Klaus Teuber | HD 40307 g | Tau Ceti e | HD 40307 g gets the edge because it's in the habitable zone and has a good chance of having a stable climate, making it a more chill spot for potential life. |