Top 10 epic failures - votes for Juicero

ImageVoterWinnerLoserReason
Cliff ClavinCliff ClavinNew CokeJuiceroWell, ya see, New Coke mighta been a flop, but at least people actually drank it, unlike that Juicero gadget that went belly up faster than a cheap lawn chair!
Marie CurieMarie CurieJuiceroSamsung Note 7I'd rather have a quirky juice press than a phone that might catch fire, safety first!
Guido van RossumGuido van RossumYahoo!JuiceroYahoo! may be past its prime, but at least it's not a $400 Wi-Fi juicer for $8 juice packs.
Alex TrebekAlex TrebekBetamaxJuiceroBetamax at least let you watch movies in the 80s while Juicero just squeezed your wallet.
DataDataSamsung Note 7JuiceroAt least the Note 7 was groundbreaking before it started catching fire; Juicero was just a pricey way to squeeze a juice pack.
Pliny the ElderPliny the ElderGoogle GlassJuiceroGoogle Glass may have been ahead of its time and kinda awkward, but at least it tried to innovate, unlike Juicero which was just an absurdly overpriced juice squeezer.
The BrainThe BrainBetamaxJuiceroBetamax at least had a fighting chance back in the day, but Juicero was just a fancy juice failure from the get-go.
Grace HopperGrace HopperGoogle GlassJuiceroGoogle Glass might have been nerdy to wear, but at least it did something beyond squishing overpriced juice packs.
Neal StephensonNeal StephensonWeWork IPOJuiceroWeWork IPO, despite its roller coaster ride, at least had some tangible assets and potential for redemption, unlike Juicero's overpriced juice press that ended up being a meme for Silicon Valley excess.
George  OrwellGeorge OrwellSamsung Note 7JuiceroEven though it went up in flames, the Samsung Note 7 still had more practical use than Juicero's overpriced juice-squeezer that couldn't squeeze juice.
ArchimedesArchimedesNew CokeJuiceroNew Coke may have been a swing and a miss, but at least it didn't make you buy a $400 juicer that works worse than your hands.
Buckminster  FullerBuckminster FullerBetamaxJuiceroBetamax, though ultimately a commercial failure, was at least a solid technology that paved the way for modern video recording, while Juicero was a pricey gadget that squeezed overpriced juice packs, solving a non-existent problem.
Charles DarwinCharles DarwinGoogle GlassJuiceroGoogle Glass had its flops but at least it tried pushing tech boundaries, whereas Juicero over-engineered a solution to a problem that didn’t really exist.
Ada LovelaceAda LovelaceSegwayJuiceroSegway might be dorky, but at least it gets you from point A to B, while Juicero just squeezed your wallet dry.
Alan Mathison TuringAlan Mathison TuringSamsung Note 7JuiceroI'll take an explosive phone over an expensive juice squeezer any day, at least it did more than just press packets!
Grace HopperGrace HopperZuneJuiceroZune was a dope music player that actually worked, while Juicero was just an overhyped, overpriced juice squeezer that nobody needed.
The BrainThe BrainGoogle GlassJuiceroAt least Google Glass had some cool tech, while Juicero was just an overpriced way to squeeze a juice pack.
Professor FrinkProfessor FrinkJuiceroSamsung Note 7Well, at least the Juicero won't explode and turn your pocket into a mini fireworks show, guh-hey!
Grace HopperGrace HopperBetamaxJuiceroBetamax was at least a groundbreaking technology for its time, while Juicero was an over-engineered juicer that nobody needed.