Top 10 cryptographic codes - votes for RC4

ImageVoterWinnerLoserReason
Buckminster  FullerBuckminster FullerSalsa20RC4Salsa20's got better security and efficiency, leaving RC4 in the dust with its vulnerabilities, so we roll with the stronger dance.
GalileoGalileoBlowfishRC4Blowfish is a more secure and reliable algorithm, while RC4 has known vulnerabilities that make it sketchy for most encryption needs.
Antoine  LavoisierAntoine LavoisierRSARC4As a pioneer in chemistry, I appreciate robust structures, and RSA, with its solid asymmetric encryption, has proven to be more secure than the vulnerable RC4.
Leonardo da VinciLeonardo da VinciRSARC4RSA's got the chops for robust encryption, while RC4's security is more like a leaky bucket, so I gotta roll with RSA.
Antoine  LavoisierAntoine LavoisierBlowfishRC4Blowfish is like that reliable friend who's got your back with strong security, while RC4 is the wildcard with known vulnerabilities.
Larry PageLarry PageAdvanced Encryption StandardRC4AES is the boss in security and performance, while RC4 is old news and vulnerable.
David MacaulayDavid MacaulaySalsa20RC4Salsa20 is way better because it's more secure and faster, leaving RC4 feeling like it's stuck in the 90s.
Ada LovelaceAda LovelaceTriple DESRC4Triple DES wins because RC4's security is like Swiss cheese—full of holes!
Professor FarnsworthProfessor FarnsworthElliptic Curve CryptographyRC4Great Scott! Elliptic Curve Cryptography is way more secure and efficient compared to that old-school RC4 stream cipher!
Professor FrinkProfessor FrinkBlowfishRC4Well, hey-hey, Blowfish is more secure, oh, and less susceptible to attacks compared to the aging RC4, glavin!
CopernicusCopernicusTwofishRC4Twofish is way more secure and reliable than RC4, which has been busted wide open with vulnerabilities.
Doogie HowserDoogie HowserSerpentRC4Serpent's got that beefy security mojo while RC4 is like rocking roller skates at a NASCAR race—way too risky.
  Socrates SocratesElliptic Curve CryptographyRC4Elliptic Curve Cryptography is like a security ninja, way more secure and efficient than the outdated and vulnerable RC4.
Abraham LincolnAbraham LincolnElliptic Curve CryptographyRC4Elliptic Curve Cryptography is more secure and efficient, making it the top hat of cryptographic protocols.
George  OrwellGeorge OrwellRSARC4RSA's solid reputation for security stands strong, whereas RC4's had its day in the sun but now has more holes than Swiss cheese.
John von NeumannJohn von NeumannSerpentRC4Serpent's got that strong encryption mojo, while RC4 is kinda outdated and has security issues.
Claude ShannonClaude ShannonBlowfishRC4Blowfish is more secure than RC4 because RC4 has known vulnerabilities and isn't considered safe for modern use.
NerdsNerdsTriple DESRC4Triple DES is more secure than RC4, which is like a wet paper bag in terms of vulnerabilities.
Doogie HowserDoogie HowserSalsa20RC4Salsa20 is way more secure and efficient than RC4, so it's the clear champion here.
Buckminster  FullerBuckminster FullerSalsa20RC4Salsa20 is more secure and efficient, having withstood extensive cryptanalysis unlike the outdated RC4.
Jensen HuangJensen HuangChaCha20RC4ChaCha20 kicks RC4's butt with its modern security and speed.
Guglielmo MarconiGuglielmo MarconiSerpentRC4Serpent's like a vault with titanium walls compared to RC4's rusty padlock when it comes to security.
Marie CurieMarie CurieTriple DESRC4Triple DES, despite its slowness, is generally more secure than RC4, which has vulnerabilities that make it an risky choice in cryptographic applications.
Kurt VonnegutKurt VonnegutAdvanced Encryption StandardRC4Advanced Encryption Standard is like a well-built spaceship, while RC4 is more like a leaky boat that hackers love to poke holes in.